Williams v. United States
United States Court of Claims
On the Proofs. The Reporters’’ statement of the case: The following are the facts of the case as found bya the court: I. The claimant, Franklin P. Williams, is at the present time a passed assistant paymaster in the United States Navy and a citizen of the United States. II.
Read the full summary
On the Proofs. The Reporters’’ statement of the case: The following are the facts of the case as found bya the court: I. The claimant, Franklin P. Williams, is at the present time a passed assistant paymaster in the United States Navy and a citizen of the United States. II. The active list of passed assistant and assistant paymaster of the Pay Corps of the Navy is composed of 30 passed assistant paymasters and 40 assistant paymasters (act of March 3, 1899, 30 Stat., 1038), together with 20 additional passed assistant and assistant paymasters (act of March 3, 1903, 32 Stat., 1197). The statute…
1Opinion of the CourtBaRNEy, J.
This is a claim of an officer in the Pay Corps of the Navy for difference in pay between the date he became entitled to be examined for promotion to the next higher grade of passed assistant paymaster and the date upon which his appointment to that grade was confirmed by the Senate.
The claim arises upon the following facts and circumstances :
By the act of March 3, 1899 (30 Stats., 1038), it was provided that—
“ The active list of passed assistant and assistant paymasters of the Pay Corps shall hereafter consist of thirty and forty, respectively,’.’
which number thereafter was increased by the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gormley v. TaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1871
- Cline v. GreenwoodOregon Supreme Court · 1882
- Adamson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1884
3Cited by1 opinion
- Crapo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1915