Screen v. Bankston
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Per curiam
After a thorough review and evaluation of the record as it is constituted on appeal, we find no merit in the assignments of error raised by appellant. In addition we find no merit in the assignments of error raised by appellees in their answer to the appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the trial court and adopt its *771reasons as our own. Costs of the appeal are to be equally divided between appellant and appellees.
AFFIRMED.
NO. 307,695, DIY. “M”
19TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE STATE OF LOUISIANA ORAL REASONS
•TUESDAY, OCTOBER 28, 1986
THE HONORABLE JOSEPH F. KEOGH,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Amacker v. AmackerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
- State v. GehlbachSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
- Flanagan v. GusteLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kenyatta Donta Cheeks v. AutoZone, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2014
- Louisiana Voter Registration/Education Crusade, Inc. v. Office of the Registrar of Voters for the Parish of OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987