Caudill v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Appeal from Custer County Court; J. C. McKnight, Judge. W. M. Caudill was convicted of a violation of the prohibitory law, and appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtFueman, J.
The appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal, which he .unquestionably had the right to do. The state has filed a motion to reman'd the case, with directions to the trial court to correct the judgment, which it also had the right to do.
In the case of Wood v. State. 4 Okla. Cr. 436, 112 Pac. 11, this court said:
“All judgments and sentences of the court must follow and be based upon the verdict of the jury. Where there is a variance between the verdict of the jury and the sentence of the court, it must appear from the record that such variance cannot be corrected without depriving…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
- Ex Parte McClureCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
- Ex Parte MingleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
- McCormick v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
- Steils v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
3Cited by16 opinions
- Dunbar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1919
- Barrett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928
- State v. CollinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
- White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
- Adams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.