Legal Opinion

Caudill v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided March 22, 1913No. A-1852PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from Custer County Court; J. C. McKnight, Judge. W. M. Caudill was convicted of a violation of the prohibitory law, and appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFueman, J.

The appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal, which he .unquestionably had the right to do. The state has filed a motion to reman'd the case, with directions to the trial court to correct the judgment, which it also had the right to do.

In the case of Wood v. State. 4 Okla. Cr. 436, 112 Pac. 11, this court said:

“All judgments and sentences of the court must follow and be based upon the verdict of the jury. Where there is a variance between the verdict of the jury and the sentence of the court, it must appear from the record that such variance cannot be corrected without depriving…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Ex Parte McClureCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Ex Parte MingleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. McCormick v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Steils v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Dunbar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Barrett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. State v. CollinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  4. White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
  5. Adams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API