Legal Opinion

Comstock v. Price

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 18, 1902PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Assumpsit, for goods sold and delivered. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Knox County; the Hon. John A. Gray, Judge presiding. Heard in this court at the April term, 1902..

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dibell

In 1898 Price owned a large farm, at Kenton, Ohio, where he raised onions and other produce for sale and shipment in bulk. Comstock was in the wholesale fruit and produce business at Galesburg, Illinois, buying and selling on his own account. In October, 1898, Comstock and Price had correspondence by letters and telegrams concerning a car load of onions. Part of the correspondence was lost and was proved orally, with some disagreement as to the terms of the lost correspondence. It seems, however, that Comstock ordered and Price shipped to him a car load of onions, containing 543 bushels,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ames v. MoirIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Trunkey v. HedstromIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Ayer v. MeadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1883

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Olson v. Wabash Coal Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1906
  2. Commercial Register Co. v. W. D. DrewAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912
  3. Consolidated Ribbon & Carbon Co. v. Crane Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1913
  4. Ft. Smith W. R. Co. v. GreenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Swain v. MehlAppellate Court of Illinois · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API