Legal Opinion

Truman v. Coghlin Machinery & Supply Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 1919PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal : Court of Appeals for Lucas county.

1Opinion of the CourtShohl, P. J.

This case is here on appeal. Plaintiff, a stockholder in The Francis Machinery Company, brought this action on its behalf against The Coghlin Machinery & Supply Company, and William Coghlin and James A. Kirkby, its principal officers. Truman originally had a one-half interest, in The Toledo Auto Tool Company. Defendant Coghlin was president, general manager, treasurer and the chief stockholder of The Coghlin Machinery & Supply Company, a corporation engaged in selling tools and supplies. Kirkby was also an officer, and they and their wives were all the stockholders. *221Among their customers was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McGourkey v. Toledo & Ohio Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Wardell v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Thomas v. MatthewsOhio Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re Cuyahoga Finance Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
  2. Farmers State Bank v. HaunWyoming Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Apicella v. Paf Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Krell v. Krell Piano Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1921
  5. Russell v. United Missionary Baptist ChurchOhio Court of Appeals · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API