Legal Opinion
Cole v. City of Fort Smith
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided June 9, 1941No. 4203PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Appellant, H. D. Cole, was convicted in the municipal court of Fort Smith, Arkansas, for an alleged violation of the provisions of ordinance No. 1568 of that city. Appellants, Lois Bowden and Zada Sanders, were convicted in the same court for a violation of ordinance No. 1172. On appeal to the circuit court a jury was waived, and, by agreement, the causes were consolidated for trial and submitted to the court. Appellants were again convicted and fines assessed. This appeal followed.
That part of the ordinance under which H. D. Cole was convicted is as follows: “Item 10. Advertising:…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Schneider v. State (Town of Irvington)Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Lovell v. City of GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Commonwealth v. NicholsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- People v. Kim YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Cook v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jones v. OpelikaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- In re KayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Busey v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Busey v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- In Re KayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.