Legal Opinion
Lotto v. Long Island Lighting Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 18, 1977PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShapiro, J.
In a class action against the defendant Long Island Lighting Company (LILCO), inter alia, to declare certain rate increases to be invalid, wherein the intervener Town of Islip (Islip) cross-claimed against the said defendant for an *432accounting on behalf of itself and its residents, LILCO appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered January 8, 1976, as denied its motion to dismiss the cross claim.* We reverse the order insofar as it is appealed from, and grant the motion to dismiss.
THE ISSUE
Was it improper for LILCO, pursuant to filed rate schedules approved by…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Purcell v. New York Central R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Cardone v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1949
- Lotto v. Long Island Lighting Co.New York Supreme Court · 1975
3Cited by3 opinions
- Porr v. NYNEX Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Lotto v. Long Island Lighting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Opn. No., New York Attorney General Reports1980