Legal Opinion

Hart v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 18, 1963No. Nos. 3127, 3128PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MYERS, Associate Judge.

Appellant Hart and three other men were charged with attempted housebreaking. Code, 1961, Sec. 22-1801 and Sec. 22-103. Appellant was also charged with carrying a dangerous weapon, a pistol, without a license. Code, 1961, Sec. 22-3204. The two cases were consolidated for trial by jury. The result was conviction of all defendants. Only Hart has filed an appeal.

Appellant complains that there was insufficient evidence to sustain his conviction on either charge. The record fails to support this contention. Suffice it to' say there was competent evidence of an attempt, or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hirabayashi v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Frank A. Gibson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
  3. William Josehp Matthews v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Keith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API