Legal Opinion

Smith v. Thigpen

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 26, 2009No. A09A0591PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, Chief Judge.

In this action to recover on a promissory note (the “Note”), plaintiff John R. Thigpen, Sr., sued defendant Charles W. Smith, seeking principal, interest, attorney fees and costs thereon. Smith answered denying any indebtedness to Thigpen, and filed a third-party complaint and cross-claim against Frank Tanner, a certified public accountant, asserting Tanner’s liability for any amount for which he might be liable to Smith under the promissory note. Smith appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Thigpen, contending that genuine issues of material…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Prophecy Corp. v. Charles Rossignol, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1986
  2. Deep South Services, Inc. v. WadeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  3. Leiter v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  4. Hawkins v. National City Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nash v. Township Investments, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  2. Carolyn Ann Lewis v. Paul B. IknerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
  3. Norman J. Nash v. Township Investments, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  4. TYLER BERRYHILL v. MIGUEL LOPEZCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API