Swenson v. Osgood & Blodgett Manufacturing Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Ramsey county to recover $6,000 for personal injuries. The case was tried before Brill, J., who directed a verdict in favor of defendant upon the conclusion of plaintiff’s testimony. From an order denying a motion for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtLovely, J.
This action is to recover for injuries received by plaintiff while he was at work in defendant’s lumber factory in the city of St. Paul. At. the close of plaintiff’s evidence, on motion for defendant, a verdict was-directed in its favor. There was a motion for a new trial, which was denied. This appeal is from that order.
Plaintiff had been engaged in the operation of a planer and matcher in the factory for three weeks previous to the time he was hurt. This machine was of considerable size, and was used to dress boards, which were carried through it by means of steam power applied to the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Anderson v. C. N. Nelson Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Gray v. Commutator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Blom v. Yellowstone Park Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
3Cited by12 opinions
- Rase v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Denver & R. G. R. Co. v. NorgateCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
- Suess v. Arrowhead Steel Products Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Glockner v. Hardwood Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Davidson v. Flour City Ornamental Iron WorksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.