Associated Energy Group, LLC v. Air Cargo Germany GMBH
District Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MELINDA HARMON, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendant Volga-Dhepr Airlines’s (<rVDA”) Motion to Dismiss, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2), 12(b)(5), and 12(b)(6), Plaintiff Associated Energy Group’s (“AEG”) claims against them. (Def s. Mot. to Dismiss, Doc. 3). After reviewing the pleadings, the motion and responses, the record, and the applicable law, the Court finds that it does not have personal jurisdiction over VDA. VDA’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) should be granted. The motions to dismiss…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- George Williams v. Yamaha Motor Corp. USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017