Angione v. Sikorsky Aircraft Corp.
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION GRANTING DEFENDANTS SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT CORP. AND ARNOLD HANAFIN CORP.’S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Dkt. ## 53, 541
Vanessa L. Bryant, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Michael Angione (“Angione”) brings a claim under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., against Defendants Sikorsky Aircraft Corp. (“Sikorsky”) and Arnold Hanafin Corp. (“Arnold”) (collectively the “Employer Defendants”). The Employer Defendants have each moved for summary judgment. For the reasons that follow, the motions are GRANTED.
I. Factual Background
Defendant…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Brandon McKerchie v. Kokosing Alberici Traylor, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2026
- Harvey v. GreenwichDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023