Legal Opinion

Greenfeld v. Squidvision Corp.

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided March 31, 2023No. 0:21-cv-60944Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 21-CV-60944-RS VALERIE GREENFELD, Plaintiff, v. SQUIDVISION CORP., KANNAHAUS CORP., ECOFLAME SOLUTIONS CORP., SCENTCAST LLC, BOBBY ORBACH, AMIR PREISLER, HEZI BASOK, and NOGA SOLOVEY, Defendants. _______________________________________/ ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS This matter is before the Court upon Defendants’ Motion for Dismissal [DE 80] (the “Motion”), and Plaintiff’s Opposition [DE 84]. For the reasons that follow, Defendants’ Motion is granted in part and denied in part. I. BACKGROUND This action…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  4. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. American Dental Assoc. v. Cigna Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API