Legal Opinion
(PC) Richson-Bey v. Bell
District Court, E.D. California
Decided July 8, 2022No. 1:22-cv-00447Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 SEAN JEFFERY RICHSON-BEY, Case No. 1:22-cv-00447-BAM (PC) 13 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT 14 v. JUDGE TO ACTION 15 BELL, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE, 16 Defendant. FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM 17 (ECF No. 7) 18 FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 19 20 Plaintiff Sean Jeffery Richson-Bey (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and 21 in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s first amended 22…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.