Legal Opinion

Cummings-El v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 9, 2003No. SC01-1501, SC02-1784PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

863 So.2d 246 (2003)

Frederick W. CUMMINGS-EL, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Frederick W. Cummings-El, Petitioner,

v.

James V. Crosby, Jr., etc., Respondent.

Nos. SC01-1501, SC02-1784.

Supreme Court of Florida.

October 9, 2003.

Tony Moss, Miami, FL; and Sara K. Dyehouse, Tallahassee, FL, for Appellant/Petitioner.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Steven R. Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Miami, FL, for Appellee/Respondent.

2Per curiam

Frederick W. Cummings-El appeals an order of the circuit court denying his motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Anstead; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Anstead.

3Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Lockhart v. McCreeSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. David Ronald Chandler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by14 opinions

  1. Cummings v. Secretary for the Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
  2. Heath v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2009
  3. Dennis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2012
  4. Hannon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
  5. Marshall v. CrosbySupreme Court of Florida · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API