Bush v. Cress
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
The question presented is whether the cause of action for malpractice alleged in the complaint is barred by the statute of limitations.
The applicable part of the statute, referring to the commencement of an action after its accrual, follows:
“The following actions shall be commenced within two years.
“For libel, slander, assault, battery, false imprisonment, or other tort, resulting in personal injury, and all actions against physicians, surgeons, dentists, hospitals, sanitariums, for malpractice, error, mistake, or failure to cure, whether based on contract or tort.” L. 1925, p. 102, c. 113, 2…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Schmitt v. EsserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
3Cited by10 opinions
- Seitz v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Wilder v. HaworthOregon Supreme Court · 1950
- Gangloff v. ApfelbachAppellate Court of Illinois · 1943
- Bush v. CressSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Miller v. TurnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.