Legal Opinion

Bush v. Cress

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 22, 1929No. 27,553PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

The question presented is whether the cause of action for malpractice alleged in the complaint is barred by the statute of limitations.

The applicable part of the statute, referring to the commencement of an action after its accrual, follows:

“The following actions shall be commenced within two years.

“For libel, slander, assault, battery, false imprisonment, or other tort, resulting in personal injury, and all actions against physicians, surgeons, dentists, hospitals, sanitariums, for malpractice, error, mistake, or failure to cure, whether based on contract or tort.” L. 1925, p. 102, c. 113, 2…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schmitt v. EsserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Seitz v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  2. Wilder v. HaworthOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Gangloff v. ApfelbachAppellate Court of Illinois · 1943
  4. Bush v. CressSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  5. Miller v. TurnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API