Legal Opinion
Taunton v. GENPAK LLC
District Court, M.D. Alabama
Decided July 30, 2010No. 2:09-cv-883PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
W. KEITH WATKINS, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Before the court is Defendant GenPak, LLC’s Motion for Summary Judgment, which is accompanied by a brief and evidence. (Docs. # 19-20.) Plaintiffs James Taunton and Arthur C. Malone Jr. filed a Response (Doc. #23), to which GenPak filed a Reply (Doc. # 31). In this action, Plaintiffs seek overtime compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 207(a)(1). The sole issue is whether § 207(a) requires overtime compensation for the hours Plaintiffs spend “on call” away from their place of employment, but not…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Bill Clark Herbert Futch Austin Hurst Louis Sliker and William Barrineau v. Coats & Clark, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Caiazza v. Carmine MarcenoDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2020