Legal Opinion
McGowan v. J. H. Winchester & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 9, 1948PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CONGER, District Judge.
The defendant moved to dismiss the complaint herein at the close of plaintiff’s case, and also for a directed verdict after all the evidence had been heard. The decision of the Court was reserved on the motions and the case was submitted to the Jury, which found that the plaintiff was injured by reason of the negligence of certain members of the crew of the SS “William A. Graham,” and so rendered a verdict in his favor.
The plaintiff is an employee of a ship repair concern which had undertaken to perform reconversion repairs on the SS “William A. Graham,” owned by the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Caldarola v. EckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Hust v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Caldarola v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1946
3Cited by3 opinions
- McGowan v. J. H. Winchester & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Dichmann, Wright & Pugh, Inc. v. WeadeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
- Mercado v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1953