Legal Opinion

Hudson v. Caruso

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided September 14, 2010No. 1:10-cr-00058PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER APPROVING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

ROBERT J. JONKER, District Judge.

The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Brenneman’s Report and Recommendation (docket # 48) concerning Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction (docket # 40), and Plaintiffs’ Objections to the Report and Recommendation (docket # 51). Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, where, as here, a party has objected to portions of a Report and Recommendation, “[t]he district judge ... has a duty to reject the magistrate judge’s recommendation unless, on de novo reconsideration, he or she finds it justified.” 12…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Granny Goose Foods, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers, Local No. 70Supreme Court of the United States · 1974

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Radiant Global Logistics, Inc. v. FurstenauDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
  2. Atomanczyk v. Texas Department Of Criminal JusticeDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2021
  3. Fort Iron & Metal Company v. City of DetroitDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022
  4. Ivy Room LLC dba Timeless Galleria v. Hazel Park, City ofDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
  5. JTH Tax, Inc. d/b/a Liberty Tax Service v. MagnotteDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API