Moffitt v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtDavenport, J.
The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called the defendant, was convicted of having possession of intoxicating liquor, to wit, a liquor commonly kno wn as home-brew, capable of being used as a- beverage, with the unlawful intent to violate the prohibition laws, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and costs, and be irii-prisoned in the co-tmty jail for a period of 30 days. From which sentence and judgment the defendant has appealed.
The testimony on behalf of the state tends to show that the officers went to the home of the defendant and searched the same, and found a quantity of liquor desig…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sprinkle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
- Vice v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
- Loveless Et Ux. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jordan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930