Acmat Corp. v. DANIEL O'CONNELL'S SONS, INC.
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtPerretta, J.
The defendant general contractor, Daniel O’Connell’s Sons, Inc. (O’Connell), entered into a contract with the third-party defendant, city of Springfield (city), for the construction of a school. The plaintiff subcontractor, Acmat Corporation (Acmat), was to perform the special interior coating work, which it proposed to do with Spray-don, an acoustical coating material different from that called for in the contract specifications, namely Cafco Soundshield. The architect, however, decided that Spray-don was not the equal of Cafco, and he would not approve its use. Acmat performed its work…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Marlow v. City of New BedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Palmer v. ClarkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Quintin Vespa Co. Inc. v. Construction Service Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
- Albre Marble & Tile Co. Inc. v. John Bowen Co. Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
- John F. Miller Co. v. George Fichera Construction Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- J. A. Sullivan Corp. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- Dehnert v. Arrow Sprinklers, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1985
- Sutton Corp. v. Metropolitan District CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- Cambridge Street Metal Co. v. CorraoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
- Vranos v. SkinnerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.