Legal Opinion
Gruska v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 18, 2002PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), dated May 4, 2001, which granted the defendants’ respective motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them, and denied their cross motion to compel disclosure.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
In support of its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it, the defendant City of New York established, prima facie, its entitlement to judgment as a matter of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Katz v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Mazzaferro v. Barterama Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Elstein v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Kempler v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Halali v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3Cited by7 opinions
- Smith v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Perez v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Regan v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Rutto v. County of WestchesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Brill v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.