Legal Opinion

Brill v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 19, 2003PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bruno, J.), dated September 11, 2002, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendant City of New York which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

*526The defendant City of New York (hereinafter the City) established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that it did not…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gonzalez v. 98 Mag Leasing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Goldston v. Town of BabylonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. Samuel v. A.T.P. Developent Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Leary v. City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Curci v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Vertsberger v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API