Perdue v. Perdue
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WEBB, Judge.
This appeal brings to the Court a question as to whether there has been a sufficient change in circumstance to return the custody of the parties’ child to the plaintiff. G.S. § 5043.7(a) provides in part,- “an order of a court of this State for custody of a minor child may be modified or vacated at any time, upon motion in the cause and a showing of changed circumstances by either party or anyone interested.” The appellant, relying on Harris v. Harris, 56 N.C. App. 122, 286 S.E. 2d 859 (1982) and Daniels v. Hatcher, 46 N.C. App. 481, 265 S.E. 2d 429, disc. rev. denied, 301 N.C. 87…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Blackley v. BlackleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Clark v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Spence v. DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Daniels v. HatcherCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Tucker v. TuckerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pulliam v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
- Best v. BestCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Perdue v. PerdueCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Pulliam v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998