Legal Opinion

Pulliam v. Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 30, 1998No. 499PA96Published

1Opinion of the Court

501 S.E.2d 898 (1998)

Carol J. PULLIAM

v.

Frederick J. SMITH.

No. 499PA96.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 30, 1998.

Jackson & Jackson by Phillip T. Jackson, Hendersonville, for plaintiff-appellant.

Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc. by Beatrice Dohrn, New York, NY; and N.C. Gay and Lesbian Attorneys by Ellen W. Gerber and Sharon A. Thompson, High Point, for defendant-appellee.

Stam, Fordham & Danchi, P.A. by Paul Stam, Jr., Apex; and James F. Lovett, Jr., Raleigh, on behalf of North Carolina Family Policy Council, amicus curiae.

Michael P. Adams, New York, NY, and Tharrington Smith by…

Also in this document: Dissent; Concurrence.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Thompson v. Wake County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. Williams v. Pilot Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. Blackley v. BlackleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  5. State v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API