COMMUNIST PARTY OF INDIANA Et Al. v. WHITCOMB, GOVERNOR OF INDIANA, Et Al.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Justice Rehnquist, Circuit Justice.
Applicants have filed a motion denominated an “Application for Stay of Order of United States District Court of the Northern District of Indiana, Hammond Division,” which order was entered following a hearing on their complaint alleging that the oath required by Indiana law in order for a party to be placed on the ballot was unconstitutional. An examination of the application, however, shows that applicants do not seek a stay of that order, but instead a partial summary reversal of the District Court order entered on October 4, 1972. While a Circuit…
2Cited by36 opinions
- Klay v. United Healthgroup, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Aaron Hope v. Warden Pike County CorrCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- In re Microsoft Corporation Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
- Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 6.56 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
- Trinity Industries, Inc. v. Chicago Bridge & Iron Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.