Legal Opinion

Tilney v. Kingsley

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 19, 1964PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

WbiNTRaub, C. J.

The Director of the Division of Taxation determined that the proceeds of certain life insurance policies paid to named beneficiaries were transfers intended to take effect’ upon the death of the insured and hence were taxable under the transfer inheritance tax law. We certified the taxpayers’ appeal before the Appellate Division acted upon it.

I

In 1937 the decedent, age 52 and uninsurable at normal rates because of a “low pulse rate,” purchased combinations of single-premium life insurance policies and single-premium, non-refundable…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Helvering v. Le GierseSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Estate of MadisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Estate of Keller v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. In Re the Transfer Tax Upon the Estate of SchmidlappNew York Court of Appeals · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Stryker Corp. v. Director, Division of TaxationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
  2. In Re Estate of LichtensteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
  3. In Re Estate of LambertSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  4. Richard's Auto City v. DIR., DIV. OF TAXNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
  5. In Re Estate of LillisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API