Legal Opinion

Estate of Keller v. Commissioner

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 3, 1941No. 371PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Murphy

This case is companion to Helvering v. Le Gierse, ante, p. 531. In all material respects the facts are alike except for the differences to be noted. Here the annuity contract provided for annual payments of $390.84 and cost decedent $3,258.20. The “insurance” policy stipulated for payment of $20,000 to decedent’s daughter at de cedent’s death, and the single premium was $17,941.80. Decedent was 74 at the time the contract was executed and died about two years later. Proceeding on the same theory as in the Le Gierse case, the Commissioner assessed a deficiency in the federal estate tax which…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Le GierseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  2. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Keller's EstateCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. TreganowanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  2. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. CliseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
  3. Estate of RoseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Estate of Strauss v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1949
  5. Gregg v. Commissioner of Corporations & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API