American Box Machine Co. v. Zentgraf
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Submission of a controversy upon an agreed statement of facts," pursuant to section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
1Opinion of the Court
Patterson, J.:
This is a submission of a controversy upon an agreed statement of facts'pursuant to‘section 1279'of the Code of Civil Procedure, and the question is whether the plaintiff is entitled to recover against the defendant for the conversion of certain machines which, prior to *523January, 1898, were delivered by the plaintiff into the possession of the firm of Reichert & Co. The machines, which were of the value of $1,070, were so delivered under a contract, the terms of which were at first set forth in a letter addressed by Reichert & Co. to the plaintiff, dated January 10, 1898, in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fearing v. . IrwinNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Meech v. . PatchinNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
- Orcutt v. RickenbrodtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
3Cited by6 opinions
- Winton Motor Carriage Co. v. Broadway Automobile Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
- American Laundry Machinery Co. v. LarsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
- Ratchford v. Cayuga County Cold Storage & Warehouse Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
- Baronberg v. HumphreysCity of New York Municipal Court · 1937
- Bolinger v. National Cash Register Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.