State v. Crawford
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hill, J:
This appeal raises the question of whether an adult sentence can be consecutive to a juvenile sanction. This is the first time this issue has been addressed in Kansas. A court’s power to impose consecutive sentences flows from statutory authority. Kansas sentencing statutes require some consecutive sentences in certain cases and give the court discretion to impose consecutive sentences in other circumstances. Because none of the consecutive-sentence statutes expressly include probations or imprisonments arising from juvenile adjudications, we hold the dis trict court had no authority…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
- State v. HittSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
- State v. BreedloveSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
- In re W.H.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. QuestedSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
- State v. BoyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
- State v. SimsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008
- State v. BoyerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008
- In re Z.T.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.