Legal Opinion

Barrett Financial Corp. v. Pine Insurance Agency

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided April 20, 2000No. CV9902371CPublished

1Opinion of the CourtKern, J.

The Plaintiff, Barrett Financial Corporation (“Barrett”), brought this action alleging that the defendant, Pine Insurance, Inc. (“Pine Insurance”), failed to obtain proper insurance coverage in accordance with Barrett’s requests. Pine Insurance moves for summary judgment on the grounds that it had no duty as a matter of law to advise Barrett to purchase an all risk policy which Barrett contends it requested. For the reasons discussed below, Pine Insurance’s motion for summary judgment is ALLOWED.

BACKGROUND

It is undisputed that Barrett’s owner and principal, Arthur Arbetter, purchased a vacant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rae v. Air-Speed, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. Bicknell, Inc. v. HavlinMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
  3. Baldwin Crane & Equipment Corp. v. Riley & Rielly Insurance Agency, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
  4. Robinson v. Charles A. Flynn Insurance Agency, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1995
  5. Hartford National Bank & Trust Co. v. United Truck Leasing Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API