Legal Opinion

Gary Dwayne Bruce v. Cal Terhune California Attorney General

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 19, 2004No. 02-16992PublishedCited by 127 opinions

1Per curiam

In this appeal from the denial of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus arising out of a prosecution for lewd and lascivious conduct with a child, we must decide whether the state court unreasonably ap*952plied clearly established Federal law on burden of proof and whether sufficient evidence exists to support the conviction.

I

A California Superior Court jury convicted Gary D. Bruce of six counts of lewd and lascivious conduct with a child under the age of fourteen in violation of Cal.Penal Code § 288.

Bruce’s prosecution stemmed from two alleged instances of molestation. The first was in…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by127 opinions

  1. Donald Eugene Lambert v. James Blodgett, Donald Eugene Lambert v. James BlodgettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. Juan H. v. Walter Allen IIICourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. Dino Kyzar v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  5. Cesar Sarausad v. Carol Porter, Cesar Sarausad v. Carol PorterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API