Legal Opinion

Rose v. Southern Trust Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1918No. L. A. No. 3956. In BankPublishedCited by 9 opinions

Willis I. Morrison, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

This case was twice heard by the district court of appeal and upon the original hearing an opinion was prepared by Mr. Justice Works (serving pro tempore). It was in part as follows:

“This is an appeal from the judgment and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

“The action was commenced against Frances L. Mooers, but she has since died and respondent has been substituted as her "executor. Appellant sought a recovery of the amount alleged to be due upon a contract by which Mrs. Mooers agreed to pay Mrs. Rose the sum of five thousand dollars for acting as her nurse and companion during…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stone v. HuntSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  2. Swafford v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Lick v. DiazCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Mitchell v. HaggenmeyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kinley v. LargentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Byrd v. SavageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. McKee v. LynchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  4. Eaton v. BrockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Cestero v. Sucesión Intestada de CesteroSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API