Legal Opinion
Staas v. Rogers
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 24, 1933No. 24283PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcNEILL, J.
This is an original action to review an award of the State Industrial Commission made in favor of respondent and against petitioners on November 15, 1932.
The Commission found that respondent had sustained a permanent partial disability, and that his earning capacity had been reduced from $7 per day to $1.50 per day, making his rate of compensation $18 per week. Petitioners admit that the injury sustained by respondent was compensable, and that’ at the time of the hearing respondent was permanently partially disabled.
There is only one question presented by this record, and that is whether the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. AllredSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Dailey, Crawford Pevetoe v. RandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Allen Water Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Hyde Construction Co. v. O'KelleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Tidal Pipe Line Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Enrico v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Keck v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Moore v. State Industrial Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Mullman v. HirschlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Lemaster v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.