Legal Opinion

Sugars v. Ohio Match Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1933No. 5984PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBudge, C. J.

From the record it appears that Ohio Match Company (hereinafter referred to as “the company”) carries on extensive logging operations in connection with the manufacture of lumber. By reason of heavy snowfalls in the vicinity where such logging operations are conducted, the company is only able to operate there for approximately six months in each year. Appellant was employed by the company each year from and including 1925 to and including 1931 in various capacities in connection with its logging operations, but chiefly as what is known as a “gyppo contractor.” During those years his…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Claim of Littler v. George A. Fuller Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Andrejwski v. Wolverine Coal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Flynn v. CarsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Orr v. Boise Cold Storage Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1932
  5. De Mann v. Hydraulic Engineering Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rude v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Carter v. Victor Chemical WorksTennessee Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Howell v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Hawaiian Canneries Co. v. Dependents of KaliHawaii Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Nelson v. Bogus Basin Recreational Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API