Kraft v. Egan
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City. This appeal was taken from an order of the Court below, (Phelps, J.) sustaining the demurrer to the-amended bill of complaint, and dismissing the bill, with costs to the defendant. The case is stated in the opinion, of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBriscoe, J.
The bill in this case is filed for a specific performance of a contract for the sale of land and improvements thereon. The original and supplemental hills, demurrers thereto, and order of Court thereon, are, by agreement of counsel, omitted from the record, and the questions to be passed upon by the Court arise upon a demurrer to an amended bill. The contract is set out in the *251bill, and is in these words. “This agreement made this 11th day of March, 1891, between John G. Kraft and Peter Forney Winebrenner, of the City of Baltimore, in the State of Maryland, of the one part, and Charles E.…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Engler v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905
- Kilday v. SchancuppSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Dixon v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1901
- Powell v. MoodyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
- Loughran v. RamsburgCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.