Legal Opinion

Dorenfield v. State of Texas

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 1934No. 6734PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

For the purposes of this opinion, the statement of the nature and result of this suit is adopted from the Brief for Appellant Dorenfield, in the following words:

"This is a quo warranto proceeding instituted by the Attorney General of the State of Texas to oust Appellant Julius Dorenfield, Jr., from the office of member of the Texas Relief Commission, to which suit Appellee R. L. Holliday is a party. Upon a trial before the District Court, judgment was rendered in favor of the State of Texas, Appellee, ousting Appellant Julius Dorenfield, Jr., from said office and finding that Respondent…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. MuseTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Trigg v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Gordon v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Avery v. Studley, MayorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1901
  5. Davis v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1872

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Aldine Independent School District v. StandleyTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Knox v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  3. Miller v. El Paso CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  4. Sullivan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  5. First National Bank of Fort Worth v. KelleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API