Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. King

U S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided January 13, 2005No. CGCMS 24270; Docket No. 1212Published

1ConcurrenceBaum, Chief Judge

I concur with the principal opinion and write only to express concern with the concept of an appellate court having authority to affirm a finding of guilty of an offense that is not included within a guilty finding before the court, but, instead, is simply closely related to the offense for which there is a finding. Article 59, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 859, grants authority to an appellate court to affirm so much of a finding of guilty as includes a lesser included offense, but says nothing about a closely related offense. Nevertheless, our higher Court, the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. FosterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  2. United States v. BivinsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
  3. United States v. BivinsUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996
  4. United States v. LittlesU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API