Legal Opinion
Freeman v. Blake Co.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided June 7, 1949No. Civ. 7720PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WYZANSKI, District Judge.
1. This is a suit under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. c. 8 by an employee seeking recovery ’of wages, liquidated damages and an attorney’s fee. Plaintiff filed the complaint July 14, 1948. The only serious issue is factual: how many hours did plaintiff work from July 14, 1946 through December 24, 1947.
2. Many facts have been stipulated. Defendant is a Massachusetts corporation making women’s girdles. , Plaintiff’s employment is in commerce covered by the Act. She does not fall within any of the exemptions. Despite a broader contention originally made in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- George Lawley & Son Corp. v. SouthCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1944
- Keen v. Mid-Continent Petroleum CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1945
- Hutchinson v. William C. Barry, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1943
- Marchant v. Sands Taylor & Wood Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1948
3Cited by11 opinions
- 34 Fair empl.prac.cas. 757, 34 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 34,300, 15 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1289 Raymond C. Blim, Morris E. Kinghorn, J.F. Vukasovic, Ralph v. Oldham, Stanley L. Boarts, Eugene Firestone, Wallace S. Repetto, and Larry N. Stewart v. Western Electric Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Blim v. Western Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Gelof v. PapineauDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1986
- Archie v. Grand Central Partnership, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- De Rose v. Eastern Plastics, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1955
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.