Legal Opinion

United States v. Bride

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 7, 2008No. 06-30247PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

Following his guilty plea to a number of drug- and firearm-related offenses and his Rule 11(c)(1)(C) plea agreement sentence of nineteen years imprisonment, Titus Bride (“Bride”) challenges the denial of his motions to substitute counsel and to withdraw his guilty plea, his two firearm-related convictions, and several aspects of the district court’s sentencing procedure. Because there was no error in any of these respects, we affirm.

I. Motions to Substitute Counsel and Withdraw Guilty Plea

After an evidentiary hearing— wherein both Bride and his attorney explained the apparent…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. Samuel KamaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. Torres-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. Jair De Jesus MejiaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. Rupert Earl McClendon United States of America v. Bernest CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. United States v. Drago Carl MusaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. BrideCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API