Legal Opinion
United States v. Drago Carl Musa
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 24, 2000No. 99-50183PublishedCited by 91 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FISHER, Circuit Judge:
While on supervised release following convictions on three counts of bank fraud, appellant Drago Carl Musa (“Musa”) was convicted of misdemeanor witness intimidation in violation of California Penal Code § 136.1(b)(1). Based on that conviction, the United States Probation Office (“USPO”) sought to revoke Musa’s supervised release. At the outset of the revocation hearing, Musa made a request for substitute counsel. The district court denied the request without inquiry. Then, after finding Musa to be a “danger to the community,” the district court sentenced Musa to the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Wayne Dale Schell v. Larry Witek, Warden Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, State of California, 1Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Torres-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Luis Montenegro-RojoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- James W. Menefield v. Robert G. Borg, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- United States v. Jawad MiqbelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Daniels v. WoodfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Michael Andrew Smith, AKA the BirdCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Gary Allen Lott, United States of America v. Johnny Marton Lott, AKA Johnny Martin LottCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Stenson v. LambertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.