Legal Opinion

Gary Fish Co. v. Leisure

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 3, 1951No. 18,142PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAchor, J.

This was an action by appellee To recover damages for personal injuries sustained by him- as a result of a collision with one of appellant’s trucks. To this cause of. action appellant filed a specific denial and also affirmative paragraphs of answer, setting up the issue that the appellee had accepted compensation from the Standard Oil Company under the Compensation Act:'

The- appellant also filed a cross-complaint against the appellees, Herbert Leisure, Marion Davis and Standard Oil Company in two paragraphs. The- first was to recover the amounts for which the appellant Gary Eish Company,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gebhart v. BurkettIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Northern Indiana Power Company v. West, Admx.Indiana Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Craig, Exrx. v. Citizens Trust CompanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Bozarth v. McGillicuddyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
  5. Marietta Glass Manufacturing Co. v. PruittIndiana Supreme Court · 1913

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Allison v. BolesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. Morgan v. ReneerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Fisher v. DriskellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API