Legal Opinion
Bono v. United States
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 7, 2001No. CIV A 99-535 JCLPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LIFLAND, District Judge
Presently before the Court is a motion by defendant United States of America (hereinafter “United States”) to dismiss the complaint filed by plaintiff Vivienne Bono (“Bono”) pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1). The United States argues that Bono’s claim does not fall within the scope of the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), and that this Court therefore lacks subject matter jurisdiction over this action. Because the Court agrees, for the reasons set forth below, the United States’ motion is granted.
BACKGROUND
The present matter involves a tort claim…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. S.A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio GrandenseSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lenore S. Raila, Whitton A. Raila v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Barbara Dolan Michael Dolan, W/h v. The United States Postal Service United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- (PS) Halousek v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020