Legal Opinion
(PS) Halousek v. United States Postal Service
District Court, E.D. California
Decided April 30, 2020No. 2:19-cv-00588Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHEILA HALOUSEK, No. 2:19-cv-0588-MCE-KJN PS 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 v. 14 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, (ECF No. 16) ET AL., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Presently pending before the court is defendant United States Postal Service’s (“USPS”) 18 Motion to Dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.1 Plaintiff has not filed an opposition, 19 and the present motion was submitted without a hearing pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). 20 The undersigned has considered defendant’s motion and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Turner v. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Hertz Corp. v. FriendSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Richard McCarthy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.