Legal Opinion
Depalmer v. Zhu
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided December 2, 2020No. 2:19-cv-01449Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 10 PATRICK DEPALMER, CASE NO. C19-1449JLR 11 Plaintiff, ORDER QUASHING SERVICE v. AND ALLOWING ADDITIONAL 12 TIME TO EFFECT SERVICE JIAN ZHU, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 I. INTRODUCTION 16 Before the court is Defendant Jian Zhu’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff Patrick 17 DePalmer’s claims against Mr. Zhu with prejudice based on Mr. DePalmer’s alleged 18 failure to sufficiently serve Mr. Zhu within the applicable statute of limitations. (Mot. 19 (Dkt. # 27).) Mr. DePalmer opposes the motion. (See DePalmer…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Direct Mail Specialists, Inc. v. Eclat Computerized Technologies, Inc., Dba Computerized TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Ronald B. Brockmeyer Eromedia, Ltd. v. David C. May v. Marquis Publications, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Steve Benny v. Danny Pipes and Charles PayneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Efaw v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Luverne L. Anderson and Josephine Rodriguez v. Allstate Insurance Company, a California Corporation, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.