Legal Opinion

City of Dublin v. State

Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division

Decided April 1, 2002No. 99CVH-08-7007PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Daniel T. Hogan, Judge.

Introduction

{¶ 1} Plaintiffs, the cities of Upper Arlington and Dublin, seek a declaration that R.C. Chapter 4939 (“Chapter 4939”) is unconstitutional. It was enacted as a rider on an 855-page biennial appropriations bill. Chapter 4939 defines “public ways” so as to include any “public street, road, highway, public easement, or public waterway,” including “the entire width of any right of way associated with the public way.” Chapter 4939 then limits the extent to which any political subdivision can control the use of its own public ways by “utility service providers”…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. ShewardOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. North Carolina Corporation Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Kansas Ex Rel. Railroad CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  5. United Fuel Gas Co. v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1929

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re Complaint of ReynoldsburgOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Toledo v. OhioOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. City of Bexley v. State, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division2017
  4. City of Cleveland v. MartinezCity of Cleveland Municipal Court · 2003
  5. S. Euclid v. FortsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API