Legal Opinion
Associated Indemnity Corp. v. CAT Contracting, Inc.
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided March 28, 1996No. 13-93-621-CVPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
YÁÑEZ, Justice.
This appeal involves a dispute between a surety and its principal. Associated Indemnity Corporation (“Associated”) issued performance and payment bonds when CAT Contracting and Michigan Sewer entered into a contract with the Cameron County Water District Board (the “District”) for construction of eight miles of water pipeline. Associated sued CAT Contracting, Michigan Sewer, GTS Equipment, Construction Equipment, Mario, Phyllis and Benjamin Diponio, and Guilio and Rosemary Catallo (collectively “Joint Venture”) after it paid the District an agreed sum under the…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Kindred v. Con/Chem, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
- Plas-Tex, Inc. v. U.S. Steel Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
- Arnold v. National County Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
- English v. FischerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Associated Indemnity Corp. v. CAT Contracting, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
- Nuno v. Pulido, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997
- Schlueter v. CareyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Revenue Markets, Inc. v. Amwest Surety InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1998
- Associated Indemnity Corp. v. CAT Contracting, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.