Legal Opinion

People v. New

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1986No. Docket Nos. 74938, 76730, (Calendar Nos. 3, 4)PublishedCited by 116 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCavanagh, J.

These consolidated cases call upon us to decide whether a criminal defendant, after pleading guilty or nolo contendere, may raise as error on appeal the denial of a motion to suppress evidence or the denial of a motion to quash the information because of insufficient evidence at the preliminary examination. We hold that by pleading guilty or nolo contendere defendants have waived their right to raise these issues on appeal. Since this issue is dispositive of both cases, we do not reach defendants’ claims that their pretrial motions were erroneously decided.

i

Defendant Roy New was originally…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. People v. GintherMichigan Supreme Court · 1973

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by116 opinions

  1. State v. SeryCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
  2. People v. ColeMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  3. People v. DenioMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  4. People v. WhiteMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. People v. CrallMichigan Supreme Court · 1993

111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API