Legal Opinion

Smith v. Regents of University of California

California Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1993No. S006588PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PANELLI, J.

Students at the Berkeley campus of the University of California are required to pay an activities fee. Part of the income from the fee is used to support student groups that pursue political and ideological causes. The student plaintiffs in this case object both to the imposition of the fee and to the manner in which it is used.

We reject plaintiffs’ challenge to the imposition of the fee. The authority to levy a student activities fee is well within the broad powers of self-governance that the citizens of California have granted the University’s Regents under the state…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. West Virginia State Board of Education v. BarnetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Roberts v. United States JayceesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Widmar v. VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Wooley v. MaynardSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System v. SouthworthSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Washington Legal Foundation v. Massachusetts Bar FoundationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  3. Goehring v. BrophyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  4. Berman v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. Scott H. Southworth, Amy Schoepke, Keith Bannach v. Michael W. Grebe, Sheldon B. Lubar, Jonathan B. BarryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API