Legal Opinion

Everingham v. Lord

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 9, 1886PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Elliott Anthony, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtMoran, J.

Before the trial of this case in the court below, a motion was made by defendants’ attorney to suppress the depositions of certain witnesses taken in the State of Pennsylvania under a commission addressed “ To W. I. Woodcock, Esq., Hollidaysburg, Blair county, Pennsylvania, or to any judge, master in chancery, notary public, or justice of the peace of the State and county above mentioned.” The deposition appeared to have been taken before one Ephraim Gerst, a notary public, and the certificate was signed by Gerst as notary public, but there was no certificate of his official character…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bradford v. ManlyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1816
  2. J. B. Lyon & Co. v. Culbertson, Blair & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Toledo, Wabash & Western Railway Co. v. BaddeleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Ala. & Tenn. Rivers Railroad v. KiddSupreme Court of Alabama · 1856
  5. Swift v. CastleIllinois Supreme Court · 1859

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Abendpost Co. v. HertelAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896
  2. Spring v. MillsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API